Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Ember Blog's avatar

Thanks for sharing that image from the old Bible — it’s a great example of how printing looked in the 16th and 17th centuries.

What you’re seeing in “Iefus” isn’t an “f” at all, and it doesn’t mean the name “Jesus” was missing from the Geneva Bible. That character is actually a long s (written as ſ), a common variant of the letter “S” used in old English printing. It looks similar to a lowercase “f” without the crossbar, which is why it’s easy to mistake for an “f” when you’re not familiar with the style. The blog post seems to have misread this long s as an actual “f.” (It is not.)

The “Ie” at the beginning is also just how they represented the name back then. The letter J didn’t exist as a separate character in most typefaces yet, so they used I for both the “i” and “j” sounds. So “Iefus” is simply the way they printed Jesus — pronounced exactly the same as we do today.

The Pilgrims on the Mayflower carried the Geneva Bible and would have been completely familiar with “Iefus” (or “Iesus”) as the name of their Lord and Savior. They read it, prayed it, and heard it preached regularly. Saying “Jesus” to a Pilgrim wouldn’t have confused them — it was the same name, just spelled and typeset according to the conventions of their time.

This is very similar to seeing “ſin” for “sin” or “ſalvation” for “salvation” in old books. It’s a typesetting and spelling convention from early modern English, not evidence that the name was absent or different.

The claim in the blog post appears to come from a misunderstanding of these old printing practices. The Geneva Bible definitely includes the name of Jesus hundreds of times — just in the style of its era.

Hope that helps clear it up! These old texts can look quite strange to modern readers, but once you know the conventions, it makes perfect sense.

Best regards,

Scot

The Real Invitation's avatar

Name = purpose = vocation

There is a reason it is not spoken.

48 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?